Announcing the changes in a parliamentary statement on Thursday, immigration minister James Brokenshire said:
United Nations : Asserting that the burden of sustainability cannot be put on the shoulders of the poor, India has said poorer nations must be given space to address their “development deficit” as they end up suffering the worst impacts of climate change while contributing the least to it.
Counsellor in the Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations Amit Narang said the international community cannot address climate change if it fails to address the “unsustainable consumption and lifestyles, particularly in the richer countries”.
Addressing the National Model UN Conference here on Tuesday, Narang cited research estimates that at least a third of human deaths annually, almost 18 million can be attributed to poverty related causes.
“It should be obvious therefore that addressing this ‘development deficit’ is the first and necessary condition if we have to achieve a sustainable world,” he said adding that there can be no sustainable development with such alarming and widespread levels of poverty and hunger.
“You cannot tell millions living in shanty towns along the coasts that building concrete homes for their families will lead to emissions. You cannot tell a child studying in the dark or a woman cooking on wood and dung that providing modern energy to them will be bad for the planet. In other words, the burden of sustainability cannot be put on the shoulders of the poor,” Narang said.
He stressed that ensuring a life of basic human dignity to everyone on the planet is the first step in addressing climate change.
“For global efforts to halt climate change to succeed therefore, our collective efforts must be sensitive to our different starting points, responsibilities and capabilities.
In their effort, the poorer countries must have the space to address their ‘development deficit’,” he said.
Emphasising the “stark climate inequality” in addressing climate change, he said, “the travesty of climate change is that the poor end up suffering its worst impacts, even though they contributed the least in causing the problem.”
“The richer countries need to step-up to the plate and urgently take steps to transition their societies towards sustainable lifestyles and consumption patterns,” he said.
India, which is often referred to as the world’s third largest emitter, has among the lowest per capita emissions in the world and India’s per capita emissions are also a mere one-third of Chinese per capita emissions.
Narang stressed that poorer countries are acting against climate change and a majority of developing countries including India and China have made mitigation pledges that exceed or broadly meet their fair shares.
@Agency report.
Announcing the changes in a parliamentary statement on Thursday, immigration minister James Brokenshire said:
The changes include a higher salary threshold for a British company employing a non-EU professional, an “Immigration Skills Charge” of £1,000 per non-EU professional hired per year, and an “Immigration Health Surcharge” for those under the ICT category.
Brokenshire said: “We will increase the Tier 2 minimum salary threshold to £30,000 for experienced workers. This change will be phased in, with the minimum threshold increased to £25,000 in autumn 2016 and to £30,000 in April 2017.”
Those migrating under the ICT category will be required to qualify under a single visa category with a minimum salary threshold of £41,500, Brokenshire said.
“To provide some further flexibility within the streamlined intra-company transfer category, we shall lower the minimum salary threshold for intra-company transferees working in the UK for between five and nine years from £155,300 to £120,000,” he said.
Britain will also remove the one year experience requirement for all applications where the worker is paid over £73,900. These changes will take effect from April 2017, Brokenshire added.
Indian professionals were given the largest number of visas under Tier 2 in the year ending September 2015. Indian IT workers accounted for 90% of visas issued under the ICT route.
Indian IT majors have several offices in Britain, mostly staffed by Indian employees.
The changes are based on recommendations made by the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) of the Home Office, which had, in a report in January, specifically mentioned India and its strengths in the IT sector to suggest new curbs.
“(Immigration) is not serving to increase the incentive to employers to train and upskill the UK workforce. Ready access to a pool of skilled IT professionals in India is an example of this,” it said in the report.
“We did not see any substantive evidence of long-standing reciprocal arrangements whereby UK staff are given the opportunity to gain skills, training and experience from working in India.”
The MAC noted that “some of the heaviest users of the intra-company transfer route are Indian companies, and the top ten employers using the intra-company transfer route are all largely employing IT workers from India”.
It said: “The evidence indicates that multinational companies with a presence in India have developed a competitive advantage in delivering IT projects in the UK.”
Singapore: The Middle East will continue to be a big source of crude oil imports for India with the US being another potential source as country’s oil demand is set to increase to five million barrels per day by 2021, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has said.
“India is most definitely a growth hotspot country in the period (through to 2021). We are looking at an extra million barrel to be added by 2021 on the back of a very strong economic growth,” Neil Atkinson, Head, Oil Industry and Markets Division at IEA, said here yesterday.
India used almost four million barrels per day of oil in 2015, backed by the strong fuel demand from the transportation sector, especially the ever increasing number of vehicles and trucks.
“The transport sector with increasing number of vehicles and trucks will lead the increase in consumption of gasoline and diesel,” said Atkinson in a keynote address at a forum promoting Singapore International Energy Week to be held 24-28 October this year.
He pointed to the many projections on Indian economic growth of eight per cent per annum in 2021, up from the average of seven per cent over the past five years or so.
“Obviously, with India’s oil product demand growing very strongly and given the fact that the country has a big refining industry, there is going to be a big increase in crude imports,” he said, highlighting the competition by crude oil exporters to gain a share of the Indian market.
He added that the Middle East will continue to be the main source of crude imports for India.
Atkinson also saw the US being another potential source of crude oil supplies to India over the long-term, albeit the volume may not be significant.
The US could be another source of crude oil supply which could benefit India in the years ahead, he said.
“We could also see in that time, not immediately, may be exports from, for example, the United States,” he said.
He also see the possibility of India stockpiling oil, like being done by China for security against any disruption given the instabilities in major hydrocarbons producing regions.
“India is a stable but not very big producer of its own oil, it make sense to have stockpile for disruption just the way the OECD countries had for the last 40 years,” he said without putting a number on the stockpiling volume.
An oil industry source estimated India’s crude oil stockpiling requirement at 100 million barrels, compared to China’s ongoing stockpiling of 300 million barrels, with a target of 500 million barrels.
The source said India’s current oil demand is about a third of China’s and it should hold at least 100 million barrels as security against any disruption to supplies though it is fastest energy growing market and closest to the Middle East suppliers.
The US has the world’s largest stockpile of crude oil at 700 million barrels.
@Agency report.
Guwahati : One member of each family in Assam will be provided jobs if Congress returns to power in the state, the party said in its poll manifesto today.
Releasing the manifesto, Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi said, “If I come to power again, I will ensure job to one member of each family. Our target is to give 10 lakh jobs in both government and private sectors in the next five years.”
The manifesto also promised to classify families as ‘poor’ whose annual income is less than Rs 2.5 lakh and give benefits accordingly.
It said, if voted to power, Congress will fill all vacant teaching posts in schools and create two lakh more such posts in the next five years. It will also regularise services of all the employees within next five years.
The manifesto promised special packages to small tea farmers, a special package of Rs 2,000 crore for the development councils, while Rs 1,000 crore each will be given to the hill and Barak valley districts.
Also, Rs 500-crore packages will be offered to each Majuli island. For those residing in ‘char’ islands, the Congress will dole out Rs 1,500 crore special package in five years, it stated and also promised to uplift the SCs and STs.
The party also promised to distribute sugar through government-owned subsidised supply stores.
Regarding erosion by the Brahmaputra river, the manifesto stated steps will be initiated to recover the lost land through scientific research so that those areas can be utilised for industry and other purposes.
It also said agriculture universities will be set up in Dhemaji and Bongaigaon. For Barak valley, Congress said a mini secretariat will be set up there and connectivity to the region will be improved.
The poll document also promised that the government will demand the Centre to construct a new airport and set up a Gauhati High Court bench in the Barak valley.
@Agency report.
Mumbai : RSS ideologue M G Vaidya has said that four states can be carved out of Maharashtra for better administrative purposes and suggested formation of a new state reorganisation commission to look into the matter.
Vaidya mooted the idea in the backdrop of Srihari Aney’s resignation as Advocate General of Maharashtra after his remarks favouring a separate Marathwada sparking a huge controversy, with opposition Congress-NCP and ruling ally Shiv Sena crying foul over it.
At an event in Jalna district of Marathwada on Sunday, Aney had said, “Marathwada bore more injustice than Vidarbha and should therefore be independent. Pressure has to be put at the Delhi level to form a separate state as the demand does not come under the purview of Mumbai.”
The BJP in the state also distanced itself from views of Aney, who had earlier called for a referendum on the question of a separate Vidarbha state.
“A new state organising commission should be formed that should be looking to fulfil two conditions. First, a state’s population should not be more than 30 million and second, it should not be less than 5 million,” Vaidya told PTI.
“If we consider the formula, four states can be carved out of Maharashtra. The present conditions are not suitable for administrative purposes. Even the RSS has four ‘praant’ (provinces) in Maharashtra, while it has six in Uttar Pradesh for administrative purposes,” he added.
Vaidya said a state’s formation should not happen after violent agitations by the people, which should be done before any agitation.
He said that while some states have high population density, others like Sikkim (around 10 lakh), Andhra Pradesh (around 14 lakh) have low density which creates instability.
“There are states like Jharkhand, Odisha, Punjab and Chhattisgarh which have a population of around 30 million and are doing well,” he said.
“Similarly, if there are four states carved out of Maharashtra, all of them can be Marathi speaking states. For purpose of administration and interest of people, states can be divided,” he said.
Vaidya said if Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis seeks his opinion, he will convey his views to him.
“I have also heard BJP is in favour of smaller states,” he said.
@Agency report.
“There has been a demand for increasing quota for senior citizens and Railway Minister Suresh Prabhu has announced in the budget so it was done accordingly,” Railway Board Member (Traffic) Mohd Jamshed said here.
The enhanced quota decision will come into effect from April 1 this year.
Jamshed said with the increase in the number of reserved berths for senior citizens, there will be now 80 to 90 berths available for senior citizens.
Besides senior citizens, female passengers above 45 years of age and pregnant women are also eligible to avail the enhanced quota.
The reserved qouta for senior citizen was introduced in 2007. A combined reservation quota of two lower berths per coach in Sleeper, AC-3 tier and AC-2 tier classes was earmarked for them.
In 2015, the existing quota of two lower berths per coach in Sleeper class was enhanced to four lower berths per coach.
It has now been decided to enhance this quota to six lower berths per coach in Sleeper class and three lower berths per coach in 3AC and 2AC classes, Jamshed said.
It has also been decided that in Rajdhani, Duronto and fully AC Express trains, this quota in 3AC class will be four lower berths per coach as against three lower berths per coach in case of normal Mail/Express trains.
@ agency report.
Chandigarh : Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar on Friday ( 18 march 2016) described the resolution passed by the Punjab Assembly against construction of Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal as “gross violation” of the orders of the Supreme Court.
Khattar, who was replying to the Governor’s address in Haryana Assembly here, was referring to the resolution passed unanimously by Punjab Assembly today, stating that they would not allow construction of SYL canal at any cost. The resolution also stated that neither there was ever any need to construct the SYL Canal nor it is today.
The Chief Minister was referring to this issue as the Supreme Court has ordered status quo on the issue of SYL Canal.
He said the state government would present its view point in the Supreme Court along with the resolution passed by Punjab Assembly.
The Chief Minister, while talking to the media after the session today, said “it appeared that the issue now raised by Punjab aimed at gaining mileage during ensuing elections.”
However, he said the issue belonged to Haryana and not to Punjab as the Presidential reference had been pending for the last several years and Haryana government had pleaded for its early hearing.
“As the Supreme Court accepted the request of Haryana, the nervousness of Punjab was revealed. Now, it is between the Supreme Court and Punjab government and Haryana has no role in it,” he said.
He said the Supreme Court has taken up the issue and in case the Punjab does so, as its today’s resolution states, the Supreme Court would take its cognizance.
The CM assured the House that Haryana would do everything possible to get its share of Ravi-Beas waters through SYL canal.
He said that SYL canal is a lifeline for farmers of Haryana and BJP has always been serious on this issue and six of its MLAs had resigned nine months before the elections, he said.
Khattar said the present state government did not sit idle on the issue of SYL canal and met Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh in Delhi and convened a meeting of MLAs and MPs of Haryana.
Taking a dig at Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal, Khattar said the move to pass a Bill to de-notify farmers land acquired for construction of SYL canal could also be an excuse of Badal to “leave” the government in the midst due to “fear” of upcoming Assembly Elections so that he might contest the polls from outside.
Earlier, Leader of Opposition Abhay Chautala sought to pass a resolution in the House to condemn today’s act of Punjab Assembly.
@Agency report.
Anandpur Sahib : Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal on Wednesday said the construction of Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal would not be “allowed at any cost and under any circumstance” and asked the people to be prepared for tough battle ahead to safeguard river waters of the state.
It was high time to make “supreme sacrifices” rather than allowing the construction of SYL canal as it would divest people of Punjab of their legitimate rights over river waters, in “blatant violation” of the nationally and internationally accepted Riparian principle, Badal said.
Addressing a gathering during religious congregation to mark the commemoration of historic ‘Hola Mohalla’ here, Badal appealed to Punjabis to prepare themselves for tough battles ahead for the purpose.
The Chief Minister said he had recently declared to safeguard the river waters of the state at any cost in accordance with the Riparian principles in the august house of Punjab Vidhan Sabha.
He declared that decisions aimed at “robbing” the state and its people of their “rights” would never be accepted to him and SAD-BJP alliance.
Badal expressed gratitude to the state BJP leadership especially Cabinet Minister Madan Mohan Mittal and state BJP Chief Kamal Sharma, who had fully supported the state’s cause for river waters.
Recalling the long ordeal of Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) for waging a relentless battle to protect the interests of the state, the Chief Minister assailed the Congress for “depriving the state of its genuine rights” especially related to river waters during their successive governments at the Centre.
Badal said the then Chief Minister of Congress Darbara Singh along with Captain Amarinder Singh, who was MP at that time, accompanied the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi for performing earth breaking ceremony of the SYL Canal, at Kapoori in 1982
Referring to Punjab Termination of Agreements Act 2004, which Congressmen claimed as their major contribution, the Chief Minister said all the agreements which were terminated through this Act, were done by Congress governments.
“Thus the Act was a mere admission of guilt by the Congress government headed by Captain Amarinder Singh. This Termination Act terminated nothing but the agreements signed by the Congress governments alone themselves” he said.
He claimed the passage of this agreement was in fact an “unintentional admission of guilt” by the Congress government.
@Agency report.